XP = Continuous Everything
Test-Driven Development = Continuously check/test
Continuous Integration = Continuously integrate code
Pair/Mob Programming = Continuously review and integrate ideas
Refactoring = Continously make (small) changes
Test-Driven Development = Continuously check/test
Continuous Integration = Continuously integrate code
Pair/Mob Programming = Continuously review and integrate ideas
Refactoring = Continously make (small) changes
only when we don’t express the intent, but keep the code implicit and low level. So, it’s not really about mocks, but about the design.
»High transaction cost incentivizes for big batches. And lack of availability, causing long waiting times, drives the transaction cost up. I.e. the more something is rare to find, the more valuable it’s perceived as.
»one line of code change that is reviewed immediately.
»but an inevitable consequence of a desire to drastically tighten the feedback loop to review and integrate the code and ideas.
»that you annoy reviewers so often that they just give up and join you in a pairing session instead.
»Long waiting times in the system incentivize increase in WIP.
And, the higher the WIP, the longer the waiting times will be.
processing time will get shorter as well because the feedback gets incorporated faster.
»Shift in “outcomes over outputs” takes away power from people that used to have monopoly on defining solutions and next steps.
»is (most probably) caused by:
»